You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Train position: 22 of 26
Phase: P3 — Ecosystem trust and broad adoption
Problem
The module references are deep, but the project lacks an adoption funnel that takes a new user from installation to a tested, bundled application and then explains the framework's architecture, contracts, compatibility, security, and upgrade model.
Acceptance criteria
Publish a versioned documentation site and README funnel whose copy-and-paste quickstart pins the exact verified v2 RC during validation and v2 GA after release, then initializes, tests, checks, and bundles a working application in under five minutes.
Document architecture, execution and initialization, modules and imports, command schemas, configuration and environment, lifecycle and signals, outputs and statuses, observability, testing, vendoring, bundling, and releases.
Make v2 the default documentation version, archive pre-v2 material as unsupported, and publish an explicit v1.4.0-to-v2 migration guide that does not suggest v1.5.0 or require legacy shims.
Explain macOS Bash 3.2 remediation and the exact supported Bash, OS, libc, userland, and external-command matrix prominently.
Publish factual comparison and integration guidance for Bashly, Argc, Argbash, Bats, ShellCheck, shfmt, Modernish, boilerplates, and package managers without unsupported superiority claims.
Run every executable example and internal link in CI, pin all installation inputs, and prevent examples from depending on unreleased main.
Use standalone community-facing terminology and show production patterns rather than only API cookbooks.
Parent: #214
Train position: 22 of 26
Phase: P3 — Ecosystem trust and broad adoption
Problem
The module references are deep, but the project lacks an adoption funnel that takes a new user from installation to a tested, bundled application and then explains the framework's architecture, contracts, compatibility, security, and upgrade model.
Acceptance criteria
main.Dependencies