Fix: simplecpp ## fails to expand function-like macro when '(' is not adjacent#655
Open
paulafy6 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Fix: simplecpp ## fails to expand function-like macro when '(' is not adjacent#655paulafy6 wants to merge 1 commit into
paulafy6 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
… adjacent
When the ## operator concatenates two tokens to form a function-like macro
name (e.g. PREFIX_ ## kind → PREFIX_SCALAR), simplecpp looked for the
argument list '(...)' only at B->next. In PAR-style indirection patterns
the '(' is separated from B by a comma or a variadic parameter token:
#define PAR(a, ...) a __VA_ARGS__
#define PREFIX_SCALAR(T, N) T N
#define DISPATCH(kind, ...) PAR(PREFIX_ ## kind, (__VA_ARGS__))
DISPATCH(SCALAR, int, x) // was: [unknownMacro] — now: int x
Because '(' was not found, expansion was aborted and the macro was
reported as unknownMacro, causing cppcheck to skip the entire translation
unit.
Fix: when B->next is not '(' and we are in the appendTokens context
(expandResult==false), walk forward on the same line skipping ',' separators
and resolving named parameter tokens via expandArg(). The first '(' found
(literally or as the head of an expanded argument) is used as lpar and
passed to appendTokens() as before. The forwardScan flag ensures
expandToken() is called on the result even when expandResult is false.
The forward scan is restricted to expandResult==false to avoid unintended
side-effects in the main expansion loop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the ## operator concatenates two tokens to form a function-like macro name (e.g. PREFIX_ ## kind → PREFIX_SCALAR), simplecpp looked for the argument list '(...)' only at B->next. In PAR-style indirection patterns the '(' is separated from B by a comma or a variadic parameter token:
#define PAR(a, ...) a VA_ARGS
#define PREFIX_SCALAR(T, N) T N
#define DISPATCH(kind, ...) PAR(PREFIX_ ## kind, (VA_ARGS))
DISPATCH(SCALAR, int, x) // was: [unknownMacro] — now: int x
Because '(' was not found, expansion was aborted and the macro was reported as unknownMacro, causing cppcheck to skip the entire translation unit.
Fix: when B->next is not '(' and we are in the appendTokens context (expandResult==false), walk forward on the same line skipping ',' separators and resolving named parameter tokens via expandArg(). The first '(' found (literally or as the head of an expanded argument) is used as lpar and passed to appendTokens() as before. The forwardScan flag ensures expandToken() is called on the result even when expandResult is false.
The forward scan is restricted to expandResult==false to avoid unintended side-effects in the main expansion loop.