Hello there,
I am investigating to use premis/prov to describe data governance at my company (Infrabel, the Belgian railway infrastructure manager).
According to premis' guidelines (https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/ontology/pdf/premis3-owl-guidelines-20220426.pdf) on page 12 :
One should link premis:RightsBasis to prov:Agent using prov:wasInfluencedBy (or its inverse property, but let's use this example).
However, prov:wasInfluencedBy https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#wasInfluencedBy clearly describes that the domain and range of the property should be a prov:Agent/prov:Entity/prov:Activity. According to https://id.loc.gov/ontologies/premis-3-0-0.html#c_RightsBasis, premis:RightsBasis is not subclassed to any of the three.
While prov-o heavily implies that we should use a more specialized version of prov:wasInfluencedBy, it still looks like premis is bending the rules a little too much here, and should mint its own property to relate a premis:RightsBasis to a prov:Agent (both ways, of course).
To be clear, my use case would look something like :
ex:ABCDataOwnerRights a premis:RightsBasis ;
premis:governs ex:DataSetABC ;
prov:wasAttributedTo ex:Michael .
ex:Michael a prov:Agent .
ex:DataSetABC a premis:Object .
Am I misunderstanding something here ? Should I mint my own property to link my ex:DataOwnerRights to a prov:Agent ?
Thanks anyway for this ontology that is in line with a w3c standard, and for the thorough documentation. It is truly a thing of beauty and I am thankful that we have ontologists like you who work for the greater good !
Hello there,
I am investigating to use premis/prov to describe data governance at my company (Infrabel, the Belgian railway infrastructure manager).
According to premis' guidelines (https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/ontology/pdf/premis3-owl-guidelines-20220426.pdf) on page 12 :
One should link
premis:RightsBasistoprov:Agentusingprov:wasInfluencedBy(or its inverse property, but let's use this example).However,
prov:wasInfluencedByhttps://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#wasInfluencedBy clearly describes that the domain and range of the property should be aprov:Agent/prov:Entity/prov:Activity. According to https://id.loc.gov/ontologies/premis-3-0-0.html#c_RightsBasis,premis:RightsBasisis not subclassed to any of the three.While prov-o heavily implies that we should use a more specialized version of
prov:wasInfluencedBy, it still looks like premis is bending the rules a little too much here, and should mint its own property to relate apremis:RightsBasisto aprov:Agent(both ways, of course).To be clear, my use case would look something like :
Am I misunderstanding something here ? Should I mint my own property to link my
ex:DataOwnerRightsto aprov:Agent?Thanks anyway for this ontology that is in line with a w3c standard, and for the thorough documentation. It is truly a thing of beauty and I am thankful that we have ontologists like you who work for the greater good !