Skip to content

Do not make 'describe table' query when schema is known#1845

Open
ianton-ru wants to merge 1 commit into
antalya-26.3from
feature/antalya-26.3/no_useless_describe
Open

Do not make 'describe table' query when schema is known#1845
ianton-ru wants to merge 1 commit into
antalya-26.3from
feature/antalya-26.3/no_useless_describe

Conversation

@ianton-ru
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Performance Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Do not make 'describe table' query when schema is known

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

With 'object_storage_remote_initiator' setting query to Iceberg table converted to remote(.., iceberg(...))
remote table function calls describe table by default to resolve remote table schema.
But when table is from DataLake catalog, schema already known, 'describe table' query can be avoided.

CI/CD Options

Exclude tests:

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with MSAN
  • All with UBSAN
  • All with Coverage
  • All with Aarch64
  • All Regression
  • Disable CI Cache

Regression jobs to run:

  • Fast suites (mostly <1h)
  • Aggregate Functions (2h)
  • Alter (1.5h)
  • Benchmark (30m)
  • ClickHouse Keeper (1h)
  • Iceberg (2h)
  • LDAP (1h)
  • Parquet (1.5h)
  • RBAC (1.5h)
  • SSL Server (1h)
  • S3 (2h)
  • S3 Export (2h)
  • Swarms (30m)
  • Tiered Storage (2h)

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Workflow [PR], commit [a1edeca]

@ianton-ru
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant