Update rules for logical/control variables#152
Open
mkavulich wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
climbfuji
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2026
climbfuji
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am ok with this. There is always going to be some ambiguity what to use, but hopefully the rules PLUS existing names in the dictionary will help.
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the PR @mkavulich! I'm happy with this replacing my previous PR. With regards to the standard names, was there a reason why |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Update the rules for logical and control variables to distinguish what prefixes are allowed and when they should be used, based on the proposal in Issue #101. Also update a few standard names based on these rules.
This PR would supersede #149
Issues
Resolves #101