ci: verify seven-repository Hoxline convergence#58
Draft
raylee-hawkins wants to merge 21 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This was referenced Jul 23, 2026
Draft
Draft
feat: add read-only case growth convergence verifier
HawkinsOperations/hawkinsoperations-platform#87
Draft
Draft
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
1. Objective
Build Hoxline Case Growth Convergence v1 within this repository''s existing authority surface.
2. Why this belongs here
Organization command-center invariants and read-only cross-repository CI orchestration.
3. Authority surface
Organization command-center invariants and read-only cross-repository CI orchestration. This PR does not make Hoxline authoritative for sibling truth surfaces.
4. Files changed
.github/workflows/command-center-invariants.ymlgovernance/COMMAND_CENTER_INVARIANTS.jsonscripts/verify-command-center-invariants.py5. Before / after behavior
Before: command-center checks did not check out and reconcile all seven repositories. After: the workflow checks out the exact seven-repository set, records revisions, runs source-owned convergence commands, sanitizes artifacts, and fails closed without push, merge, ledger, runtime, or proof-promotion authority.
6. Validation commands and results
python -B scripts\verify-command-center-invariants.py-> PASS (checked_files=18);git diff --check-> PASS.7. Generated artifacts
Sanitized source-revision and convergence outputs uploaded by the workflow only after private-path scanning.
8. Adversarial tests
Verifier self-tests reject missing repos, unsafe permissions/triggers, direct-main writes, merge/ledger/proof mutation, and unsanitized artifact upload.
9. Known limitations
Workflow execution on GitHub is pending. Green CI will remain validation evidence only.
10. Private-data scan
PASS. No credentials, tokens, email addresses, MUFG/customer terms, raw private evidence, or checked-artifact workstation paths were found. Expected absolute-path strings exist only in hostile tests/verifier logic where applicable.
11. Claim-boundary scan
PASS. Blocked phrases appear only in explicit negative tests, blocked-claim lists, or fail-closed boundary logic. No runtime, signal, production, customer, public-safe, analyst/AI approval, final authorization, or closure status was promoted.
12. Proof ceiling
CONTROLLED_REPO_CONVERGENCE_AND_LOCAL_FIXTURE_REVIEW_ONLY13. CI governance
Green CI is validation evidence within its scope; green CI is not approval.
14. Merge authority
This draft PR is not merge approved. Human governance review is still required. No merge or auto-merge is authorized.
Related convergence drafts