CCM-17846: Sonar PR Decoration Fix#594
Open
jamesthompson26-nhs wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
masl2
approved these changes
May 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Problem
SonarCloud PR decoration (quality gate comment on PRs) was not appearing reliably on pushes to open PRs.
Two root causes were identified:
scripts/reports/perform-static-analysis.shalways passed-Dsonar.branch.name, forcing SonarCloud into branch analysis mode.PR decoration requires PR analysis mode with:
sonar.pullrequest.keysonar.pullrequest.branchsonar.pullrequest.baseThe PR workflow did not previously run with PR context on every PR update.
Without
pull_request: synchronize, pushes to an open PR could miss the required PR event context for Sonar PR analysis.Fix
1) Sonar scanner context switching in static analysis script
Updated
scripts/reports/perform-static-analysis.shto build Sonar arguments dynamically:GITHUB_EVENT_NAME=pull_request:-Dsonar.pullrequest.key=...-Dsonar.pullrequest.branch=...-Dsonar.pullrequest.base=...-Dsonar.branch.name=...This enables proper SonarCloud PR decoration for PR-triggered runs while preserving branch analysis for non-PR runs.
2) PR workflow now triggers on PR updates (
synchronize)Updated
.github/workflows/cicd-1-pull-request.yaml:pull_request.typesnow includes:openedreopenedsynchronizeThis ensures each push to an open PR runs in PR event context, allowing the script above to select PR analysis mode.
3) Added concurrency guard to avoid duplicate CI spend
Added workflow concurrency for same ref:
${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }}cancel-in-progress: true4) Added
pushtrigger formainUpdated
.github/workflows/cicd-1-pull-request.yamlto also run on:push.branches: [main]This ensures the pipeline runs after PR merge to
mainfor post-merge validation/publish flow.Resulting behavior
pull_requestcontext, Sonar uses PR analysis mode, decoration can be posted to PR.pushtomain.Type of changes
Checklist
DT3-Specific Checklist
Sensitive Information Declaration
To ensure the utmost confidentiality and protect your and others privacy, we kindly ask you to NOT including PII (Personal Identifiable Information) / PID (Personal Identifiable Data) or any other sensitive data in this PR (Pull Request) and the codebase changes. We will remove any PR that do contain any sensitive information. We really appreciate your cooperation in this matter.