Skip to content

[Klaud Cold] Update minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm vLLM ROCm image to v0.22.0#1620

Merged
functionstackx merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
klaud-cold/minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm-v0.22.0
May 31, 2026
Merged

[Klaud Cold] Update minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm vLLM ROCm image to v0.22.0#1620
functionstackx merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
klaud-cold/minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm-v0.22.0

Conversation

@functionstackx
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@functionstackx functionstackx commented May 30, 2026

Summary

Update vLLM ROCm image from v0.21.0 to v0.22.0

Recipes touched: minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm

Test plan

  • full-sweep-enabled sweep passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Note

Low Risk
Config-only container image pin for a single benchmark recipe; no application code, auth, or sweep matrix changes.

Overview
Bumps the MiniMax-M2.5 MXFP4 MI355X vLLM benchmark recipe (minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm) from vllm/vllm-openai-rocm:v0.21.0 to v0.22.0 in .github/configs/amd-master.yaml. Model, runner, and fixed-seq-len search space are unchanged.

Adds a matching perf-changelog.yaml entry for config-key minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5c4abc6. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

….22.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@functionstackx functionstackx force-pushed the klaud-cold/minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm-v0.22.0 branch from fe7bf6f to adc937c Compare May 30, 2026 22:11
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! For vLLM & SGLang, please ensure that your recipes is similar to the official vLLM recipes and/or the SGLang cookbook

If it is not, please create a PR first before we can merge your single node PR into the master branch. Let's ensure that the documentation is first class such that the entire ML community can benefit from your hard work! Thank you

PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. If re-running failed jobs is attempted, PR authors are responsible for ensuring it passes. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/manage-workflow-runs/re-run-workflows-and-jobs#re-running-failed-jobs-in-a-workflow

As a rule of thumb, generally, PR authors should request a review & get a PR approval from the respective companies' CODEOWNERS before requesting a review from core maintainers.

If additional help is needed, PR authors can reach out to core maintainers over Slack.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@functionstackx
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/reuse-sweep-run

@functionstackx functionstackx merged commit c5bd85d into main May 31, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
@functionstackx functionstackx deleted the klaud-cold/minimaxm2.5-fp4-mi355x-vllm-v0.22.0 branch May 31, 2026 00:45
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant