Skip to content

Optimize Parquet block index updates#7669

Merged
SungJin1212 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
optimize-bucket-index-parquet-marker-reads
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

Optimize Parquet block index updates#7669
SungJin1212 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
optimize-bucket-index-parquet-marker-reads

Conversation

@SungJin1212

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR does:
The bucket index updater re-read every block's parquet converter marker from object storage on each update cycle, causing a GET call per parquet block per cycle even when nothing changed.
This PR skips re-reading the marker when the block already has a valid-version parquet entry in the previous index, reducing repeated GET calls.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]
  • docs/configuration/v1-guarantees.md updated if this PR introduces experimental flags

@SungJin1212
SungJin1212 force-pushed the optimize-bucket-index-parquet-marker-reads branch from 6335303 to 6b8b887 Compare July 10, 2026 10:48

@friedrichg friedrichg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jul 15, 2026
Signed-off-by: SungJin1212 <tjdwls1201@gmail.com>
@SungJin1212
SungJin1212 force-pushed the optimize-bucket-index-parquet-marker-reads branch from 6b8b887 to 6189e1d Compare July 21, 2026 01:49
@SungJin1212
SungJin1212 merged commit d8815ef into master Jul 21, 2026
40 checks passed
@SungJin1212
SungJin1212 deleted the optimize-bucket-index-parquet-marker-reads branch July 21, 2026 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size/M type/performance

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants