fix(ui): hide empty scheduling list for read-only users#105
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For read-only users (no admin rights on the processing), the scheduling section showed an empty, useless list header when the processing had no scheduling configured.
Why: the empty scheduling list looked broken/awkward for users who can only read and have nothing scheduled.
What changed: in the non-admin schema branch, drop
schema.properties.schedulingwhenprocessing.schedulingis empty, so the section is hidden entirely. Read-only users who do have scheduling still see it (read-only); admin users are unaffected.Regression risks:
!canAdminProcessing) branch is touched; the admin branch is unchanged.processing.valueis guaranteed defined here (the computed returns early at the top if it isn't), so the new?.lengthaccess can't throw.