Multiinfo#87
Open
chrisamiller wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Conversation
…lds, additional overwrite/clearing flags, etc
Collaborator
Author
adding gzip support for annotation files
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
overhauls vcf-info-annotator:
Multi-column annotation (--column-mappings / -m)
old: accepted a single info_field argument with separate -f/-d flags for format and description.
new: -m/--column-mappings flag that accepts a comma-separated list of source_col:info_field:type:description mapping
allows multiple TSV columns to be written to multiple INFO fields. Source and version metadata can optionally be appended as 5th and 6th colon-separated fields
TSV format now requires a header row.
does some sanity checking on fields in coerce_value
Points for discussion:
change in how overwrite works:
Reverse compatibility is broken - if we keep these changes, we'll have to update some pipelines downstream. We could shoehorn in a way to maintain the old behavior, but this felt cleaner. We should talk, though!