docs: publish Wave 5 Phase 1 audit deliverables#790
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 55 minutes and 53 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
github-actions
Bot
added
area:documentation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several new audit reports and a migration plan addressing repository file organization, documentation consolidation, and canonical configuration interdependencies (such as CLAUDE.md boundaries, labeling strategy, and issue fields configuration). It also adds a new CANONICAL_CONFIGS_GUIDE.md to document the relationships between key configuration files. The reviewer feedback suggests documenting migration maps and notes in a central /docs/MIGRATION.md file and adding a corresponding validation checklist item to the migration plan.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
| - Execute approved move or retention strategy. | ||
| - Update dependent paths if file moves occur. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When executing file moves or residual migrations, please ensure that any migration maps and notes are documented in the central /docs/MIGRATION.md file. This helps contributors easily track and follow migration rules across the repository.
| - Execute approved move or retention strategy. | |
| - Update dependent paths if file moves occur. | |
| - Execute approved move or retention strategy. | |
| - Update dependent paths if file moves occur, and document migration maps and notes in a central /docs/MIGRATION.md file. |
References
- Document migration maps and notes in a central
/docs/MIGRATION.mdfile to ensure contributors can follow migration rules mentioned in README files across the repository.
| - [ ] CI guardrails active and tested | ||
| - [ ] migration report updated with final status |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add a validation checklist item to verify that any migration maps and notes have been documented in the central /docs/MIGRATION.md file.
| - [ ] CI guardrails active and tested | |
| - [ ] migration report updated with final status | |
| - [ ] CI guardrails active and tested | |
| - [ ] migration report updated with final status | |
| - [ ] migration maps and notes documented in /docs/MIGRATION.md |
References
- Document migration maps and notes in a central
/docs/MIGRATION.mdfile to ensure contributors can follow migration rules mentioned in README files across the repository.
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 523d1a175b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ## Recommended Validation Hooks | ||
|
|
||
| - `scripts/validation/validate-issue-fields.cjs` now includes strict cross-file parity checks for `Status`, `Priority`, and `Type` mappings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This says validate-issue-fields.cjs already performs strict cross-file parity checks, but the current validator only reads .github/issue-fields.yml and docs/ISSUE_FIELDS.md and never loads .github/labels.yml or .github/issue-types.yml, so status/priority/type drift against those canonical files would still pass. Because this guide and the #660 audit can be used to close the parity work or decide CI coverage, the inaccurate claim can leave the promised guardrail absent for canonical-config changes.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #790CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
|
🚫 This PR description is missing required template sections. Missing required section(s): Linked issues, Changelog, Global DoD checklist Please update the PR body using one of the repository PR templates:
This check must pass before merge. |
1 participant
Summary\nPublish the Phase 1 audit/report deliverables that were linked in closed Wave 5 issues so they are present on .\n\n## Included files\n- \n- \n- \n- \n- \n- \n- \n\n## Related issues\n- #660\n- #661\n- #664\n- #665\n- #671\n- #672\n- #673\n\n## Notes\n- This PR is docs-only and intentionally excludes config/code changes from PR #788.\n- Existing local modification to was left untouched and uncommitted per request.