Skip to content

Patch a test change - #590

Open
gnufied wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
gnufied:test-efs-utils
Open

Patch a test change#590
gnufied wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
gnufied:test-efs-utils

Conversation

@gnufied

@gnufied gnufied commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 33ef9a36-6cc5-476c-b64c-ee9931ae6edd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f1f77a and 7ba7502.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/driver/aws-efs/aws_efs_tags_controller.go

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

getEFSClient now emits an informational log before it processes AWS EFS client credentials.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 13 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title refers to a test change, but the changeset adds an informational log to AWS EFS client processing. Update the title to describe the added informational log in getEFSClient or the AWS EFS credential-processing path.
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided, so its relation to the changeset cannot be evaluated. Add a brief description of the informational log added before AWS EFS client credential processing.
✅ Passed checks (13 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed The patch changes only the EFS controller and adds no Ginkgo test titles; affected EFS tests use static Go Test function names.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed The PR changes only one informational log in production code; it adds or modifies no Ginkgo test code, cluster operations, waits, or test assertions.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The patch adds only one klog.Infof call in production code; it adds no Ginkgo tests or MicroShift-sensitive API references.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The PR changes only one production log line in getEFSClient and adds no Ginkgo e2e tests, so SNO compatibility checks do not apply.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed The patch changes only aws_efs_tags_controller.go by adding an informational klog line; it adds no manifests, replicas, affinity, topology spread, selectors, tolerations, or PDB constraints.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed The added klog.Infof is inside getEFSClient, called by the queue worker, not main/init/TestMain or suite setup; the repository has no OTE suite hooks.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The commit changes only aws_efs_tags_controller.go by adding a log line; it adds no Ginkgo e2e test or networking/external connectivity behavior.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed The PR adds only a logging statement with no cryptographic operations. The existing code uses SHA256 (secure) and avoids weak algorithms. No MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, 3DES, Blowfish, or ECB usage detected.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed The PR modifies only a Go source file, not Kubernetes manifests. It adds a logging statement. No container privilege escalation settings or security concerns are introduced.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The added log statement "Getting efs client" is a generic informational message that does not expose passwords, tokens, API keys, PII, session IDs, hostnames, or customer data.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from jsafrane and rhrmo July 31, 2026 13:59
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gnufied

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 31, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gnufied: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/aws-efs-single-zone-operator-e2e-extended 7ba7502 link false /test aws-efs-single-zone-operator-e2e-extended
ci/prow/aws-efs-operator-e2e-extended 7ba7502 link false /test aws-efs-operator-e2e-extended

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant