Skip to content

Isomorphism antisym#1204

Open
peterthiemann wants to merge 2 commits into
plfa:devfrom
proglang:isomorphism-antisym
Open

Isomorphism antisym#1204
peterthiemann wants to merge 2 commits into
plfa:devfrom
proglang:isomorphism-antisym

Conversation

@peterthiemann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Proposed new language to address issue #1203

@wadler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

wadler commented Jun 4, 2026

Thanks! Three comments.

  1. Suggested edit: "A value A≲B is definitionally ..." --> "A record value is definitionally ..."

  2. I didn't understand the explanation of how eta expansion of records enables the use of records. If one applies the eta expansion to A≲B and then simplifies to A≲B the result is to A≲B, so I fail to see how this helps.

  3. I think it's overkill to define ≲-antisym twice. What would you think about removing the first definition and replacing it by the second?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants