[pull] main from python:main - #1316
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…-154752) initscr() called while a newterm() screen is current returned a second window object over that screen's standard window, with no reference to the screen. Either wrapper could then free the window used by the other. Return the screen's own standard window instead.
…H-152551) Run a test in a fresh interpreter subprocess, so that it does not share global or interpreter state with the rest of the test run. It can decorate a test method (only that method runs in a subprocess) or a TestCase subclass (the whole class runs in one subprocess, with its setUpClass()/setUp()/tearDown()/ tearDownClass() running there rather than in the parent). Failures, errors and skips, including those of individual subtests, are reported for the test; a failure or an error shows the original subprocess traceback. The subprocess inherits the parent's resource, memory, verbosity and failfast configuration, so that requires_resource(), bigmemtest() and similar behave the same in both processes. A decorated test is skipped where subprocesses are unavailable, since it must spawn one. The test.support.isolation.runningInSubprocess flag is true in the subprocess, so that fixtures can choose what to run there. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…b -p (#154469) _PdbServer inherits _cmdloop, which wraps cmdloop() in _maybe_use_pyrepl_as_stdin(). That context manager blanks self.prompt to '' so that a local pyrepl draws the prompt itself. The remote server, however, never reads from a local pyrepl -- it transmits self.prompt to the client over the socket -- so the blanking made it send an empty prompt whenever the target process had a pyrepl-capable terminal (pyrepl_input is set). Override _maybe_use_pyrepl_as_stdin() in _PdbServer to a no-op, keeping the real prompt. Add an integration test that attaches to a target running under a pty, so PyREPL is genuinely enabled inside it, and asserts the transmitted prompt is "(Pdb) ". Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )